💬 EN

#

---

What kinds of questions can I ask developers that will help me help them think of end-to-end tests they should be running? Particularly as pertains to helping encourage them to do idempotent deployments

To help developers think of end-to-end (E2E) tests they should run, particularly for ensuring idempotent deployments, you can ask targeted questions that encourage them to consider critical workflows, edge cases, and deployment behaviors. Below are some categories of questions to guide the discussion:

---

General End-to-End Test Scenarios

1. What are the key user workflows in the application?
   • Encourage developers to identify the most critical user journeys, such as login, checkout, or data submission flows, and ensure these are tested from start to finish¹².
2. What are the integration points in the system?
   • Ask about external services, APIs, or databases that interact with the application and how their behavior should be validated³⁴.
3. What edge cases could break the system?
   • Probe for scenarios like large inputs, unexpected combinations of inputs, or invalid data that could cause errors⁵.

---

Deployment-Specific Questions

1. What happens if a deployment is interrupted and restarted?
   • This encourages thinking about idempotency—whether deploying multiple times results in a consistent state⁶.
2. How does the system handle rollback scenarios?
   • Ask how they would test rolling back a failed deployment and whether it leaves the system in a stable state.
3. Are there any one-time operations during deployment?
   • For example, database migrations or cache invalidations. Ensure these operations are idempotent and tested thoroughly.
4. What should be tested post-deployment to confirm success?
   • Discuss smoke tests or health checks that run after deployment to validate core functionalities⁶.

---

Data Integrity and Consistency

1. How does the system ensure data consistency across deployments?
   • For example, if a deployment modifies database schemas or data formats, how do they ensure backward compatibility?
2. What happens if a deployment introduces partial changes?
   • Encourage them to test for scenarios where only some components (e.g., microservices) are updated.

---

Automation and Continuous Testing

1. How can these tests be automated and added to CI/CD pipelines?
   • Suggest automating E2E tests to catch issues early during development and before production deployments¹⁵.
2. Are there tests for different environments (e.g., staging vs production)?
   • Ask how they validate deployments in various environments to mimic real-world conditions⁵.

---

Idempotency-Specific Questions

1. Can this deployment be safely repeated without side effects?
   • For example, ask about database migrations or API changes that might not behave correctly if applied multiple times.
2. What happens when configuration changes are reapplied?
   • Probe whether redeploying with identical configurations causes any unintended behavior.
3. Are there any stateful dependencies that could cause issues during repeated deployments?
   • Discuss how they handle states like session data or temporary files during deployments.

---

By asking these questions, you can guide developers toward identifying robust E2E test cases while fostering practices that ensure idempotent and reliable deployments.

---

Can you give me some more “tell me about a time when” thought-provoking questions for when they blow me off?

Here are some thought-provoking “tell me about a time when” questions you can use if developers initially dismiss your inquiries:

1. “Tell me about a time when a seemingly minor bug caused significant issues in production. How did you handle it?”⁷
2. “Tell me about a time when you had to break bad news to someone about a critical defect. How did you approach the situation?”⁷
3. “Tell me about a time when developers rejected your reported bugs. How did you handle the situation and what was the outcome?”⁷
4. “Tell me about a time when you had very little time to meet a deadline. How did you prioritize your testing efforts?”⁷
5. “Tell me about a time when you discovered an interesting or unusual bug. What made it stand out, and how did you approach solving it?”⁷
6. “Tell me about a time when you had to test a feature without proper documentation. How did you approach the testing process?”⁷
7. “Tell me about a time when you had to manage conflicts amongst team members during a critical testing phase. How did you resolve the situation?”⁷
8. “Tell me about a time when you had to question the requirements or design of a feature. How did you communicate your concerns?”⁸
9. “Tell me about a time when you had to adapt your testing strategy due to unexpected challenges or constraints. What did you learn from the experience?”⁹
10. “Tell me about a time when you identified a critical issue just before a release. How did you handle the situation and what was the outcome?”¹⁰

These questions encourage developers to reflect on real-world scenarios they’ve encountered, potentially leading to more meaningful discussions about testing practices and quality assurance.

---

Pretend I’m a QA trying to pick a developer’s brain about a specific application to shortlist the E2E tests I should most prioritize us adding to the project. How can I really get them to think deeply?

To get developers to think deeply about the application and help you prioritize E2E tests, you can ask open-ended, thought-provoking questions that encourage them to reflect on the application’s critical workflows, risks, and edge cases. Here’s how you can approach it:

---

Application Workflows and User Journeys

1. “Tell me about a time when a user reported an issue that disrupted their workflow. What part of the system was affected?”
   • This helps uncover critical user journeys that need testing.
2. “What are the top three workflows users rely on daily? What would happen if one of these broke?”
   • This identifies high-priority areas for E2E testing.
3. “Can you walk me through how a user interacts with this feature from start to finish? Are there any points where things could go wrong?”
   • Encourages developers to think holistically about user experiences.

---

System Risks and Edge Cases

1. “Tell me about a time when a deployment caused unexpected issues in production. What could have prevented it?”
   • This surfaces past pain points that might guide test priorities.
2. “What parts of the system do you feel are most fragile or prone to failure? Why?”
   • Helps identify risk-prone areas for targeted testing.
3. “What happens if a user does something unexpected, like entering invalid data or skipping steps in a process?”
   • Prompts consideration of edge cases often overlooked in development.

---

Integration Points and Dependencies

1. “Tell me about a time when an integration with an external service failed. How did it affect the system?”
   • Highlights external dependencies that need robust E2E tests.
2. “What are the most critical third-party services or APIs this application relies on? How do failures in those systems impact us?”
   • Focuses on testing integrations and their error-handling mechanisms.
3. “How does the application handle data consistency across services or components during high traffic or failures?”
   • Encourages thinking about state management and data integrity under stress.

---

Deployment and Idempotency

1. “Tell me about a time when a deployment didn’t go as planned. What was the root cause?”
   • Helps identify areas where idempotent deployments or post-deployment tests are crucial.
2. “What happens if we deploy the same code multiple times in a row? Are there any operations that could cause issues?”
   • Prompts reflection on idempotency and repeatable processes.
3. “What steps do you take after deployment to confirm everything is working as expected? Could any of these be automated?”
   • Surfaces potential post-deployment smoke tests or health checks.

---

Historical Context and Lessons Learned

1. “Tell me about a time when a bug slipped through testing but could have been caught earlier. What kind of test would have caught it?”
   • Encourages reflection on gaps in current testing practices.
2. “What features have historically caused the most issues during development or production? Why do you think that is?”
   • Points to areas needing more thorough E2E coverage.
3. “When was the last time we had to roll back a release? What went wrong, and how can we prevent it in the future?”
   • Highlights scenarios where rollback or recovery processes should be tested.

---

Encouraging Collaboration

1. “If you were a user, what would be your biggest frustration if something went wrong in this application?”
   • Shifts perspective to focus on user impact.
2. “If you were responsible for QA, what would be your top three priorities for testing this application?”
   • Engages developers directly in prioritizing test cases.
3. “What parts of this application are hardest to debug when something goes wrong? How can we test those more effectively?”
   • Pinpoints complex areas requiring thorough testing.

---

By framing your questions around real-world scenarios, past experiences, and potential risks, you can encourage developers to think deeply and collaboratively about what E2E tests will provide the greatest value for the project.

---

How can we ensure that our test case prioritization aligns with business priorities

To ensure that test case prioritization aligns with business priorities, consider the following strategies:

1. Collaborate with stakeholders: Involve developers, QA engineers, and business stakeholders in the prioritization process to gain a comprehensive understanding of the software’s requirements and risks¹¹.
2. Identify critical functionalities: Focus on features that are fundamental to business operations or have a high impact on customer satisfaction. These should be tested first¹²¹³.
3. Conduct risk analysis: Evaluate both the probability and severity of defects in different parts of the software. Prioritize high-risk areas, such as frequently updated features or complex functionalities involving multiple components¹³.
4. Assess business criticality: Prioritize test cases that cover functionalities directly impacting key business outcomes like revenue and customer satisfaction¹³.
5. Align with business requirements: Begin by identifying critical business functions and features of the software under review. Define requirements and design test cases or link existing ones to these requirements¹⁴.
6. Use requirement-based prioritization: Prioritize test cases based on the importance of the requirements they cover and the value they provide to the business¹².
7. Consider customer impact: Prioritize test cases for features that have received frequent feedback or are critical to user experience¹⁵.
8. Address regulatory compliance: Prioritize test cases for functionalities that must adhere to regulatory standards or compliance requirements¹⁵.
9. Utilize historical data: Prioritize test cases for areas with a history of issues to prevent the recurrence of known problems¹⁵.
10. Establish clear communication: Create channels for team members to share insights, concerns, and suggestions for test case prioritization, ensuring everyone understands the software’s requirements, risks, and priorities¹¹.
11. Regularly review and adjust: Adopt an agile approach by regularly reviewing and adjusting the test case prioritization to adapt to changing circumstances and maintain an effective strategy throughout the project¹⁶.

By implementing these strategies, you can ensure that your test case prioritization aligns closely with business priorities, focusing testing efforts on the most critical and impactful areas of the software.

---

What metrics should we use to measure the effectiveness of our test case prioritization

To measure the effectiveness of your test case prioritization, you can use a combination of metrics that evaluate how well your prioritized test suite aligns with business goals, detects defects, and optimizes testing efforts. Below are key metrics to consider:

---

1. Test Coverage

• Definition: Measures the percentage of application requirements or code covered by the prioritized test cases.
• Formula:

\(\text{Test Coverage} = \left( \frac{\text{Number of requirements mapped to test cases}}{\text{Total number of requirements}} \right) \times 100\)

• Why It Matters: Ensures that critical functionalities and requirements are adequately tested, reducing the risk of untested areas¹⁷¹⁸.

---

2. Average Percentage of Faults Detected (APFD)

• Definition: Evaluates how quickly faults are detected by the prioritized test suite.
• Formula:

\[\text{APFD} = 1 - \left( \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{m} TF_i}{n \cdot m} \right) + \frac{1}{2n}\]

Where: - \(TF_i\): Position of the first test case detecting fault \(i\) - \(m\): Total number of faults - \(n\): Total number of test cases

• Why It Matters: A higher APFD indicates that critical defects are detected earlier, improving efficiency and reducing debugging costs¹⁹²⁰.

---

3. Defect Detection Rate

• Definition: Measures how effectively the prioritized test cases uncover defects.
• Formula:

\(\text{Defect Detection Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Number of defects detected}}{\text{Number of test cases executed}} \right) \times 100\)

• Why It Matters: Indicates how well the prioritization focuses on high-risk areas likely to contain defects¹⁷²¹.

---

4. Requirements Coverage

• Definition: Tracks the alignment between prioritized test cases and business or technical requirements.
• Formula: Same as Test Coverage.
• Why It Matters: Ensures that critical business priorities are addressed and reduces gaps in requirement validation¹⁸²².

---

5. Code Coverage

• Definition: Measures how much of the application’s code is exercised by the prioritized tests.
• Types:
  • Statement Coverage
  • Branch Coverage
  • Condition Coverage
• Why It Matters: Highlights untested areas in the codebase, ensuring comprehensive testing²⁰²¹.

---

6. Test Case Execution Time

• Definition: Tracks the time taken to execute prioritized test cases.
• Why It Matters: Helps identify slow or inefficient tests, enabling optimization for faster feedback loops²¹²².

---

7. Defect Density

• Definition: Measures the number of defects detected per module or feature.
• Formula:

\(\text{Defect Density} = \frac{\text{Total number of defects}}{\text{Size of module (e.g., lines of code)}}\)

• Why It Matters: Helps focus testing on modules with higher defect density, improving prioritization accuracy²².

---

Tips for Implementation:

1. Use a combination of metrics (e.g., APFD, Test Coverage, and Defect Detection Rate) for a holistic view.
2. Regularly review metrics to adapt prioritization strategies based on evolving project needs.
3. Communicate metrics with stakeholders to ensure alignment with business goals.

By leveraging these metrics, you can quantitatively assess and refine your test case prioritization to maximize its effectiveness in meeting both technical and business objectives.

---