#
Is there anything I can do to ephemerally spin up and configure an Oracle database with just a few tables and rows per table, in a way that will be performant enough to run in a CI/CD pipeline
Yes, you can ephemerally spin up and configure an Oracle database with a few tables and rows to use in a CI/CD pipeline. Here are some approaches:
- Use Docker Containers: Oracle provides Docker images for databases. Pre-create a seed database with your tables and data in a persistent volume or baked into the image. This allows quick container startup, ensuring consistent environments for tests1.
- Pluggable Databases (PDBs): Use Oracle’s pluggable database feature to clone a lightweight PDB for testing. This is faster than creating a new database from scratch and provides isolation12.
- SQLcl and Liquibase: Automate schema and data provisioning using tools like SQLcl and Liquibase. These tools integrate well with CI/CD pipelines for applying changes deterministically34.
- Data Virtualization: Use Oracle’s CloneDB or third-party virtualization tools to quickly create test instances from snapshots of an existing database12.
These methods ensure performance and reliability while fitting into CI/CD workflows.
Where would I store the image definition to get the fastest spin-up, if my testing runs in AWS CodeBuild off of code stored in AWS CodeCommit?
To achieve the fastest spin-up time for your Oracle database image in AWS CodeBuild with code stored in AWS CodeCommit, you should store the image definition in Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR). Here’s why:
- Proximity to CodeBuild: ECR is fully integrated with AWS services, including CodeBuild, which minimizes latency during image pulls.
- Performance: ECR is designed for high availability and low-latency access, ensuring quick container startup times.
- Integration: CodeBuild can directly authenticate and pull images from ECR without additional configuration.
- Cost Efficiency: ECR charges only for storage and data transfer, making it cost-effective compared to third-party registries.
You can push your Docker image to ECR and reference it in your CodeBuild project configuration for seamless integration.
How fast could the pipeline probably run, then?
The pipeline’s runtime will depend on several factors, but with proper optimization, you can achieve a fast execution time. Here’s an estimate based on typical configurations:
- Source Retrieval: Pulling code from AWS CodeCommit typically takes a few seconds, as AWS has optimized this process to be very fast (e.g., ~7 seconds reported recently)5.
- Container Spin-Up: Using an Oracle database image stored in Amazon ECR, container spin-up time can range from 10 to 30 seconds, depending on the image size and caching67.
- Build and Test Execution: Running lightweight builds and tests with caching enabled (e.g., for dependencies or Docker layers) can take 1–3 minutes in AWS CodeBuild78. For small databases with a few tables, database initialization should add minimal overhead.
- Parallelization: If steps like database setup and application tests are parallelized, the overall runtime could be reduced further96.
Estimated Total Time: With optimizations, your pipeline could run in approximately 2–5 minutes for lightweight builds and tests.
-
https://oracle-base.com/articles/misc/oracle-databases-and-cicd-pipelines ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
https://www.oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/database/implementing-devops-principles-with-oracle-database.pdf ↩ ↩2
-
https://blogs.oracle.com/database/post/part-1-oracle-database-cicd-with-sqlcl-and-liquibase ↩
-
https://www.reddit.com/r/oracle/comments/o2kyd8/cicd_pipeline_for_oracle_19c_database/ ↩
-
https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/comments/1bz4cz6/improve_cicd_pipeline_to_decrease_build_time/ ↩
-
https://www.nclouds.com/blog/accelerate-cicd-pipeline-aws-codepipeline-codebuild/ ↩ ↩2
-
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codebuild/latest/userguide/build-caching.html ↩ ↩2
-
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70544643/is-there-any-way-to-speed-up-aws-code-build-with-maven ↩
-
https://cloud.folio3.com/blog/optimizing-aws-codepipeline-workflows/ ↩